How Vestigial Organs Work

Are These Organs Really Vestigial?

The coccyx, shown here with the sacrum. Vestigial or not vestigial?
The coccyx, shown here with the sacrum. Vestigial or not vestigial? Images

Some say that scientists are changing the rules of the game when they play "Vestigial or Not Vestigial." In particular, opponents of evolution, including proponents of creationism or intelligent design, say that there's no such thing as vestigial organs, because a creator wouldn't design something imperfectly or without purpose. At the very least, those who doubt evolution reject the idea that an atrophied organ is evidence of a common ancestor. One common argument is that if we don't know the purpose of a body part yet, it may be due to a lack of anatomical knowledge.

In many cases, organs believed to be vestigial have been shown to serve an important purpose in the body. For example, the coccyx may assist in holding our insides in and supporting nearby organs, even though it can be removed with few ill effects. The appendix has been shown to function as a producer of white blood cells and antibodies. If a person were to come down with a condition like diarrhea or dysentery, the appendix would repopulate the gut with microbes needed to stave off further infection. In developed countries, we have managed to survive without our appendix largely because of the medicines we have available. To truly test the functionality of the appendix, we'd have to study its removal in underdeveloped countries that still face diseases such as dysentery without modern medicine.

But no one, not even Charles Darwin or Robert Wiedersheim, ever said that a body part had to be completely functionless or useless to be considered vestigial. A structure is considered vestigial because it's not performing the function it was designed to perform, as compared to other creatures with the same part. While the appendix may have taken on the role of a white blood cell factory, it doesn't serve the digestive function it performs in other animals.

With this kind of dispute, it's hard to know what the final score of "Vestigial or Not Vestigial" is. Just like us humans, it's a work in progress. So while we're at this evolutionary half-time, visit the next page for some more interesting articles.


Related Articles

More Great Links


  • Bergman, Jerry. "Do any vestigial organs exist in humans?" Creation ex nihilo Technical Journal. August 2000. (July 28, 2008)
  • DeWitt, David A. "Setting the Record Straight on Vestigial Organs." Answers in Genesis. May 28, 2008. (July 28, 2008)
  • Eubanks, Michelle Rupe and Trevor Stokes. "Theories differ over functions of vestigial organs." Times Daily. Jan. 24, 2008. (July 28, 2008)
  • Isaak, Mark. "The Counter-creationism Handbook." University of California Press. 2007.
  • Miller, Brandon. "Top 10 Useless Limbs (and Other Vestigial Organs)." Live Science. (July 28, 2008)
  • Spinney, Laura. "Remnants of Evolution." New Scientist. May 17, 2008.
  • Theobald, Douglas. "29+ Evidences for Macroevolution. Part 2: Past History." The TalkOrigins Archive. (July 28, 2008)
  • Thompson, Clive. "The Appendix Rationale." New York Times. Dec. 9, 2007. (July 28, 2008)
  • Wanjek, Christopher. "The Appendix: Slimy But Not Worthless." LiveScience. May 30, 2006. (July 28, 2008)